We have updated Nantucket Erosion with photos from Sunday the 15th for the bluff and Monday the 16th for Eel Point and Steps Beach area.

Sankaty Bluff photos are here http://www.nantucketerosion.com

And the North Shore Comparison galleries have been updated at these links –

Eel Pointwww.nantucketerosion.com/?page_id=1799

Hinckleywww.nantucketerosion.com/?page_id=1823

_MG_1433

_MG_1596

I’m working on the bluff photos from this weekend and North Shore photos taken today. They won’t be ready today so I thought I would post this photo of lovely sanderlings that Dirck took on Sconset Beach yesterday. There were hundreds of them enjoying a feast.

_MG_1466

Tagged with:
 

This weekend brought the weather that has proved to be the bluff’s biggest enemy – a steady rain. When it was over, a 9 foot piece of the bluff was on top of the geotubes along with a multitude of other large clumps and the bank at Swept Away had eroded to the edge of its patio.

We will have more photos and a fuller report tomorrow.

_MG_1426

_MG_1432

_MG_1256

_MG_0756

_MG_1420

Last month, we were on a Nantucket beach and saw one of the most beautiful sights we have ever seen. It was breathtaking. We haven’t posted those photos yet – we are saving them for our website redo that we are working on.

Yesterday,  I had the opposite experience. Sconset Beach is again an ugly construction site. This is the future of Sconset Beach. These projects require constant maintenance involving heavy machinery.  It was so sad to see this once beautiful beach spoiled.  This is an environmental and aesthetic mess – and the bluff continues to erode.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http://www.nantucketerosion.com

20150308-_MG_9797

Tagged with:
 

I made a trip to the bluff today and the North Shore. I’ll have a complete report here and on Nantucket Erosion as soon as possible.

Tonight I  thought I’d post a few of the lovely textures and colors I found today on the parts of the bluff that haven’t been interfered with. Click on the thumbnails for the larger photos.

 

Tagged with:
 

_MG_1295

_MG_1331

_MG_1336

_MG_8554

_MG_8581

_MG_8594

_MG_8613

_MG_8645

_MG_8677

_MG_8698

Tagged with:
 

I made a very quick trip to the North Shore this morning. The temp was at 9 degrees and the wind chill was brutal. I could only stay for a few minutes. We have lots of new work. We are redoing our website so we can show larger photos.

_MG_8470

We made a trip to Sankaty Bluff yesterday in frigid temperatures. The beach was coated in ice, the sand was frozen and the bluff was covered in snow. As cold as it was, the beauty of Sconset Beach made it worth the trip in spite of the fact that there are more and more new and decayed jute bags at the toe of the bank . The SBPF continues to talk about increasing the length of the geotubes to 4000 feet. Sconset Beach – once one of Nantucket’s most beautiful, will soon be it’s ugliest.  A member of the Board of Selectmen who voted for the geotubes once said to me that it didn’t matter what was done on Sconset Beach because nobody went there. I’m glad this view isn’t shared by everyone or we wouldn’t have protected many of the beautiful wilderness areas our country has. We hope the citizens of Nantucket will continue to fight to protect Nantucket and its beaches, even the beaches that aren’t heavily visited.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http://www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_7062

 

Tagged with:
 

We spent a very cold day photographing erosion. We have a lot of photos to go through and will have this blog and Nantucket Erosion updated tomorrow.

_MG_1099

The boat basin is slightly thawed creating an interesting effect in the water. If you click on this photo, you’ll get an extra large version to view. This was taken with the iphone 6 plus.

bbsmall

Tagged with:
 

The Inquirer & Mirror recently published an article echoing the SBPF’s claim that the Sankaty Bluff geotubes “did their job”. We wish the Inquirer & Mirror had done its job differently and published a balanced and more accurate article instead of quoting only one source, a spokesperson of the SBPF. As a result, the article featured a number of inaccuracies, half truths and fantasies. When it comes to an issue like the geotubes where the ultimate outcome could be that our beaches are lost or ruined and a beautiful natural resource is destroyed, our newspaper owes it to our community do a more thorough  job, or not do it at all. When one reports on a volatile political issue and only uses one source, then one loses credibility. If the Inquirer and Mirror wants to come out in favor of hard-armoring Nantucket’s shoreline, in spite of overwhelming evidence of harm, it should do so on the editorial page and not present an unverified public relations release as news.

There is nothing like the Sankaty Bluff anywhere else on Nantucket. As it erodes, it reveals the geologic history of our island with fossils dating over 125,000 years old and it will be ruined by the fruitless machinations of the SBPF with the blessing of a few members of our Board of Selectmen and the Mass DEP.

20100925-_MG_0184

This photo was taken in September of 2010. One can clearly see that the damage here is from runoff – not toe erosion.

20141210-_MG_3218

This photo was taken in October of 2014, on top of the geotubes. It shows the same type of erosion – not from the toe, but from the top.

20130323-_MG_1617

The above photo was taken in March of 2013. The face of the bluff falls away even when the jute tubes protect it from the waves.

20140322-_MG_5855

This photo shows the bluff face near the end of the walk after it lost another round of planting in March 2014.

20141019-_MG_9527

Here is the same area, planted months ago and starting to give. No toe erosion at this spot in the past year. This was taken in October of 2014

20141210-_MG_2929

And the same spot taken in December of 2014. The plantings have slid down the face of the bluff. We have seen this happen repeatedly, even behind these jute bags. The beach grass has no chance to develop long roots in the bluff environment.

Tagged with:
 

Edit: Looking back on our previous photos, we think it is likely that the geotubes were ripped by the machines used to add sand and not by the storms.

We went to the geotubes late this evening after being told that they had ripped. The have ripped in one section and in others there is noticeable sagging – geotubes deflategate perhaps. There has been a considerable amount of sand delivered, a different color than the previous load a couple of weeks ago. We aren’t sure what that signifies but found it interesting. The bluff continues to erode from the top, despite assurances that the geotubes are “doing their job”. We found frozen sediment on top of the tubes that had made its way through the newly poured sand. Swept Away is in worse shape – nearing the edge.

It was a beautiful evening with a lovely gradient sky and a huge moon that broke the horizon as we walked back to the stairs.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http://www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_0931

_MG_6761

_MG_6764

_MG_6779

_MG_6794

_MG_0953

_MG_6733

Our final comparative post is now up on Nantucket Erosion. These are photos taken from the end of the bluff walk to the geotubes. The photos are posted in pairs, the first of the pair was taken on January 11, 2015 and the second on January 28, 2015.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http://www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_0751

We have updated Nantucket Erosion with comparative photos taken from Steps Beach to Hinckley.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http://www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_6634-1

Tagged with:
 

Nantucket’s north shore was hit hard by winter storm Juno. We have a set of comparative photos on Nantucket Erosion. The first photo of each pair was taken on January 11th and the second on the 29th after the storm.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http://www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_5480-1

_MG_6311-2

Tagged with:
 

A great deal of Nantucket pit sand was delivered over the edge of Sankaty Bluff one week ago, and a great deal of that sand has already gone the way of the tides, courtesy of the first nor’easter of 2015. The geotubes below the bluff have been frequently exposed by runoff erosion in the 9 months since the last delivery, the installation looking very ragged for a significant portion of that time. The first major effort to thoroughly cover them was effective for a few days until winter storm Juno brought hurricane-force winds and several higher than normal tides. The result of the storm was not only the first full-length exposure of the 900′ of second and third tier tubes, but the exposure of both the north and south ends as well. We have seen some end scour on the north end over the last year, but this was the first heavy loss on both ends. Returns designed to prevent this end scour, part of the original plans and required by the conditions of the emergency certificate allowing the installation, were never installed. These exposures of the tubes can be considered “firsts” because this storm was the first real test of the structure. It was hit hard by waves that caused noticeable toe erosion to the north and south of it, and it must be acknowledged that the bank along its length was untouched. As a victory, it must be considered to be of the pyrrhic type, as the bluff is rapidly eroding  from above, not from infrequent wave action, but for 1 day out of the last 365, it offered some protection.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http://www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_5677-1

For the first time since their installation, the south ends of the second and third tiers of geotubes have been exposed.

_MG_0760-2

The entire 900′ length of the structure is devoid of covering along the front.

_MG_0770-3

Some tattered bits of scour apron and straps between the tubes and on the beach.

_MG_0771-4

One of the many full-sized sheets of polyethylene between the tubes. The torn edges of the plastic raise the possibility that parts of the unapproved material have gone seaward. The project manager has cut away and removed the sheeting as it has become exposed.

_MG_0780-5

Each succeeding tier rests a third of its width on the tier below, with the remainder supported by a “bench” of sand behind. If the bench is allowed to wash away, the tubes can roll backwards toward the bank. With gaps caused by the overlapping tubes and displaced scour aprons, one wonders about the integrity of the “seal” between layers.

_MG_5739-6

Loose polyethylene from the installation on the beach. How much sand is gone from under the second tier of tubes?

_MG_5756-7

While the front is washed clean, there is still a heavy layer of new pit sand on top of the envelope.

_MG_5784-8

More of the shredded polyethylene.

_MG_5812-9

The elevation of the beach dropped enough during the storm to expose even the first, below-grade tier of tubes. Wave energy deflected from the end of the armoring contributed to the major collapse of the bank next to the clay knob as seen above. Ordinarily the knob would offer protection to its lee side.

_MG_5818-10

The exposed north end shows the results of typical end scouring. Without the requisite (if not actually effective) returns or tapers, the waves flank the armoring, wrapping around and removing material from the ends and eventually from behind as they began to do here. Note that the back of the top tube is now about 2′ lower than its front. If enough material is lost from behind, the tubes will roll backwards.

Tagged with:
 

A full blog post will  have to wait till tomorrow evening. We finally got our power back on but need some rest. We have a lot to say about what we saw today on the bluff and will report in full tomorrow. Here are a couple of shots from today.

 

tubes2

tubes

 

 

Tagged with:
 

Dirck and I went to the bluff today. We have tons of photos but won’t be able to post them until they get our power back on!  It’s been an adventure here the last couple of days. We’ll have an update as soon as possible.

Tagged with:
 

The bluff continues to melt as there is less distance from its face to the wetlands. There has been no toe erosion but the disintegration of the bluff worsens.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http:www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_0713

We went to the bluff on Sunday to see how it had fared from last weeks high winds. We have a full set of photos on Nantucket Erosion.

As you can see from the photo below, Swept Away is now deeply undercut.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http:www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_5230

Tagged with:
 

There’s a small bumper sticker seen around Baxter Road that reads “Retreat Will Not Save Sconset”. It’s ironic then that the SBPF’s viewing pen could only be saved by a retreat from the ravaged edge of Sankaty Bluff. While the area of the pen is not under the “protection” of the geotube installation, it is subject to the same erosive forces  along the most rapidly decaying stretch of the island’s eastern shore. Equally ironic is the very existence of the pen to begin with, provided so the public can view the accelerated erosion, said pen being recently not 24 inches from the worst destruction on all of the bluff. This well documented destruction is due to runoff from the top of the bluff and through its face, with not a bit of it being from toe erosion. It would be difficult to pick a better place to show visitors the failure of the geotube installation short of walking the beach itself, which we recommend in any case, to understand the dynamics of Sankaty Bluff.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http:www.nantucketerosion.com

_MG_3962

The patch where the grass is worn away shows the location of the viewing pen before its retreat.

_MG_3957

The pen’s new location, while offering greater safety, prevents those inside from seeing the collapse of the bank virtually at their feet.

_MG_0395

To see the unabated erosion, these men have stepped in front of the pen.

_MG_0306

Approaching the edge is to be discouraged, as the increasingly vertical bank could lose large chunks suddenly. 90° is not Sankaty’s natural angle of repose!

_MG_0321

The cottage “Swept Away” looks to be running out of land and out of time. The split rail fence will not stand much longer.

_MG_3981

SBPF’s outdated photo accompanying the announcement of their successful appeal of the ConCom’s decision looks considerably different than this, a more common view.

_MG_0373

The concrete footings at right were exposed only to the first crack one year ago. That represents about an 8′ loss in that time. Neither building remnant was visible from this vantage point then.

_MG_5008

The face of the bluff below “Swept Away” in January of 2014. A fairly straight edge.

_MG_4310

January 5, 2015 sees a radically altered face. The runoff from the top and face has cut deeply into the bluff, the cut becoming wider as it does so.

_MG_0416

The cuts on either side of the cottage threaten to isolate it.

_MG_4356

Different colors indicate different materials as Sankaty itself rapidly retreats.

_MG_4405

The geotubes? They’re still there and still exposed while the bluff disintegrates from above.

Tagged with:
 

We wish all our readers and collectors a peaceful and prosperous 2015.

(Go Cowboys and Patriots!)

DSC_3225

Tagged with:
 

Mass DEP has issued a ruling favoring the SBPF on the Sankaty Bluff geotube issue. Although evidence and opinions were submitted in time for the September deadline, this ruling was held until today, making it difficult for appeals to be made over the holidays when everyone is on vacation. This kind of tactic should not be allowed by an institution that exists to serve the people.

Money can destroy a beach but it cannot create one naturally. Our beaches are being covered by geotubes, jute bags, snow-drift fences and sea walls in a futile attempt to stop the ocean. This will be the anti-environmental legacy that will be left by the SBPF.

_MG_4221

Tagged with:
 

The bluff sustained considerable damage once again after the recent nor’easter. Plantings and netting were destroyed at one section, large amounts of the bluff dropped to the geotubes and the runoff once again was prominent.

You can see more and larger photos on Nantucket Erosion at http:www.nantucketerosion.com .

_MG_2916

_MG_2929

_MG_3103

_MG_3069

_MG_3149

_MG_3170

_MG_3295

_MG_3335

_MG_3230

The Nantucket High School Whalers football team enjoyed a great comeback year under new head coach Brian Ryder, ending as Mayflower League Small School Champions with a record of 8 wins and 3 losses. High school football may be much the same in most parts of the country, but how many teams must board a boat for a 2½ hour ride for away games? It’s all part of being a player or a fan on Nantucket.

Although they started with a 7 game winning streak, the Whalers were hampered by injuries to several key players late in their season, winning 1 out of the last 4 against their toughest opponents.

The links below will take you to a presentation of our photographs of the 2014 season. They are best viewed on a big screen! The videos loop, but stop playing when you scroll past them. You can scroll through the smaller images or you can click on them to enlarge. A second click will reduce them to their original size. You can also click to enlarge and then use your arrow keys to advance through all  at that size. On mobile devices, tapping on the small images will do the same, and swiping the screen will take you through the collection.

Nantucket Whalers – Part One.

Nantucket Whalers – Part Two.

_MG_8902

The Whaler defense waits for the play near their end zone.

Tagged with:
 
Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.